Skip to main content

What does 10 am mean?

I was foxed when I was told that the meeting is fixed for "sharp" 10 am. There is nothing sharp about either the meeting or 10 am.

Habits die hard and as usual I carried my trusted companion which has helped me retain a cover on my head that helps keeping cool in summer and warmth in winter - a book. Does it matter which book is it? I have read more books by default waiting for 10 am than by design.

So it was, meeting started with a cup of tea at noon. Great start, I said to myself. Thankfully the biological needs will drive the meeting to a closure before the scheduled duration of 3 hours. Anyways, lunch at 1 is far more critical.

I go into time machine and recount the meaning of time across various trips in parts of our great country.

Meet at 10 means

- sometime in the morning after mid morning tea and before lunch in the seat of power city
- after stock market opens up in a fiercely tea loving "dry" city
- planning to take 8.14 fast, reaching at 9.44 and then sharing a cab for 11 minutes drive to the meeting venue
- anytime during the day in the civil servant's (or civil master's) office

Then I met somebody who actually demonstrated that there is a logic in all this. I pleaded as if falling apple has not had any impact on me and I am not doing "eureka" - idiotic looks.....

You see, it is all related to our culture.

I never knew watches demonstrated culture - or do they?

Life is all about context. You got to understand the language (I am wondering whether it is a language class or NLP or body language or astrology). It has to be seen that 10am is said in what context.

I am confused - how come a citizen changes the context from city to city and season to season.

It is a maze - what appears simple is as straight as a jalebi?

oops its is food fascination again..... I am hungry... gotta go... lunch at 11am or dinner at 1 in night...

Who cares as long as it is food. Better if is free.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New addiction

Unsaid speaks louder than words

The message was clear. US is facing a financial crisis. Americans need to contribute to get out of "conveniences". But the statements like "it will get worse before it gets better" without a timeline and references to a time of slavery etc are not comforting. American era may be ending faster than anticipated. Obama's inaugration speech was truly indicative of a man under pressure from the start. As any sportsman will confirm, it's all in the mind and followers just follow the leader and Obama has not set the bar high at all. My view is that it is heading south fast...... Contrast this with the situation in India. All that leaders are talking about is security and resolve to protect Indian at ANY COST. Economic issues are tackled with a view, yes it is a slowdown but we will still beONE OF THE BEST IN THE WORLD. No talk of worsening things, less spending by government. News headlines are all talking about shrinking bottomlines for profit and NOT LOSS issues....

How reality loses to momentum?

Truth prevails is an old adage that seems to be losing its relevance in the current sentiments. Still I am confident that "Truth shall prevail". Hopefully, sooner than later. The case in point is the investor confidence in the stock market. Indian markets are aping the performance of the stock markets of developed world. In fact, the possible loss in indices is reasonably predictable in the last few weeks based on what happened on the previous day in Europe and US. Are the situations similar? Are Indian businesses facing the same situation as companies in western world? Are Indian corporate giants going bust like crackers in Diwali? Have companies of great repute and history in India have filed for bankruptcy? Has any company in India reported loss of sales (top line) in double digits and evaporation of profits? Slowdown yes. How bad is India? Is it comparable to West? It has baffled me as to how convenient has it been to be infected with "western sentiments" virus ...