Skip to main content

Have Breakfast or be breakfast

This article is all about what we know! Insight is to know it fast enough....

This is an article by Dr Moorthy Prof. at IIM Bangalore


"Have breakfast "or" be breakfast"!

Who sells the largest number of cameras in India?

Your guess is likely to be Sony, Canon or Nikon. Answer is none of the
above. The winner is Nokia whose main line of business in India is not
cameras but cell phones.

Reason being cameras bundled with cell phones are outselling stand
alone cameras. Now, what prevents the cell phone from replacing the
camera outright? Nothing at all. One can only hope the Sonys and Canons are
taking note.

Try this. Who is the biggest in music business in India? You think it
is HMV Sa-Re-Ga-Ma? Sorry. The answer is Airtel. By selling caller tunes
(that play for 30 seconds) Airtel makes more than what music companies make
by selling music albums (that run for hours).

Incidentally Airtel is not in music business. It is the mobile service
provider with the largest subscriber base in India. That sort of
competitor is difficult to detect, even more difficult to beat (by the
time you have identified him he has already gone past you). But if you
imagine that Nokia and Bharti (Airtel's parent) are breathing easy you
can't be farther from truth.

Nokia confessed that they all but missed the smartphone bus. They admit
that Apple's Iphone and Google's Android can make life difficult in future.
But you never thought Google was a mobile company, did you? If these
illustrations mean anything, there is a bigger game unfolding. It is not so
much about mobile or music or camera or emails?

The "Mahabharat" (the great Indian epic battle) is about "what is
tomorrow's personal digital device"? Will it be a souped up mobile or a
palmtop with a telephone? All these are little wars that add up to that big
battle. Hiding behind all these wars is a gem of a question - "who is my
competitor?"

Once in a while, to intrigue my students I toss a question at them. It
says "What Apple did to Sony, Sony did to Kodak, explain?" The smart
ones get the answer almost immediately. Sony defined its market as audio
(music from the walkman). They never expected an IT company like Apple to
encroach into their audio domain. Come to think of it, is it really
surprising? Apple as a computer maker has both audio and video
capabilities. So what made Sony think he won't compete on pure audio?
"Elementary Watson". So also Kodak defined its business as film cameras,
Sony defines its businesses as "digital."

In digital camera the two markets perfectly meshed. Kodak was torn
between going digital and sacrificing money on camera film or staying
with films and getting left behind in digital technology. Left undecided it
lost in both. It had to. It did not ask the question "who is my competitor
for tomorrow?" The same was true for IBM whose mainframe revenue prevented
it from seeing the PC. The same was true of Bill Gates who declared
"internet is a fad!" and then turned around to bundle the browser with
windows to bury Netscape. The point is not who is today's competitor.
Today's competitor is obvious. Tomorrow's is not.

In 2008, who was the toughest competitor to British Airways in India?
Singapore airlines? Better still, Indian airlines? Maybe, but there are
better answers. There are competitors that can hurt all these airlines and
others not mentioned. The answer is videoconferencing and
telepresence services of HP and Cisco. Travel dropped due to recession.

Senior IT executives in India and abroad were compelled by their head
quarters to use videoconferencing to shrink travel budget. So much so,
that the mad scramble for American visas from Indian techies was nowhere in
sight in 2008. (India has a quota of something like 65,000 visas to the
U.S. They were going a-begging. Blame it on recession!). So far so good.
But to think that the airlines will be back in business post recession is
something I would not bet on. In short term yes. In long term a resounding
no. Remember, if there is one place where Newton's law of gravity is
applicable besides physics it is in electronic hardware.

Between 1977 and 1991 the prices of the now dead VCR (parent of Blue-Ray
disc player) crashed to one-third of its original level in India. PC's
price dropped from hundreds of thousands of rupees to tens of thousands. If
this trend repeats then telepresence prices will also crash. Imagine the
fate of airlines then. As it is not many are making money. Then it will
surely be RIP!

India has two passions. Films and cricket. The two markets were
distinctly different. So were the icons. The cricket gods were Sachin
and Sehwag. The filmi gods were the Khans (Aamir Khan, Shah Rukh Khan
and the other Khans who followed suit). That was, when cricket was
fundamentally test cricket or at best 50 over cricket. Then came IPL and
the two markets collapsed into one. IPL brought cricket down to 20
overs. Suddenly an IPL match was reduced to the length of a 3 hour
movie. Cricket became film's competitor. On the eve of IPL matches movie
halls ran empty. Desperate multiplex owners requisitioned the rights for
screening IPL matches at movie halls to hang on to the audience. If IPL
were to become the mainstay of cricket, as it is likely to be, films have
to sequence their releases so as not clash with IPL matches. As far as the
audience is concerned both are what in India are called 3 hour
"tamasha" (entertainment) . Cricket season might push films out of the
market.

Look at the products that vanished from India in the last 20 years.
When did you last see a black and white movie? When did you last use a
fountain pen? When did you last type on a typewriter? The answer for all
the above is "I don't remember!" For some time there was a mild
substitute for the typewriter called electronic typewriter that had
limited memory. Then came the computer and mowed them all. Today most
technologically challenged guys like me use the computer as an upgraded
typewriter. Typewriters per se are nowhere to be seen.

One last illustration. 20 years back what were Indians using to wake
them up in the morning? The answer is "alarm clock." The alarm clock was a
monster made of mechanical springs. It had to be physically keyed every day
to keep it running. It made so much noise by way of alarm,that it woke you
up and the rest of the colony. Then came quartz clocks which were sleeker.
They were much more gentle though still quaintly called "alarms." What do
we use today for waking up in the morning? Cellphone! An entire industry of
clocks disappeared without warning thanks to cell phones. Big watch
companies like Titan were the losers. You never know in which bush your
competitor is hiding!

On a lighter vein, who are the competitors for authors? Joke spewing
machines? (Steve Wozniak, the co-founder of Apple, himself a Pole,
tagged a Polish joke telling machine to a telephone much to the mirth of
Silicon Valley). Or will the competition be story telling robots? Future is
scary! The boss of an IT company once said something interesting about the
animal called competition. He said "Have breakfast *or*. be breakfast"!
That sums it up rather neatly.

- Dr. Y. L. R. Moorthi is a professor at the Indian Institute of
Management Bangalore. He is an M.Tech from Indian Institute of
Technology, Madras and a post graduate in management from IIM, Bangalore.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should professional duty or personal preference prevail? Moral dilemma!

I had a very fruitful meeting for a possible new client. The project was interesting and there was keen interest by the potential client to use the services on offer. Sounds good, said my colleague. We should send a proposal for the engagement. I wasn't so sure. Project is interesting, fee may be decent as well but do I feel comfortable working with the client? A categorical NO emerged from within me. The interaction with client was emotionally challenging. I would have had to deal with am emotional conflict on the assignment with the client. I found it difficult to accept his style of operation. This was not a knee jerk reaction but thought through analysis. Professionally, it is the task that I commit to and should do the same. Personally I do not want to work with the individual. What do I do? I have declined the assignment but the question still remains. Is it fair? Is it just? Would a doctor take a decision to cure a patient based on liking? Should an advocate dec

Tough times - different actions

After a trip to the financial capital of India, Mumbai, I landed in the flashy city of Delhi. Of many people that I met and talked to in Mumbai, the discussion hovered around the difficulty faced by people in stock market, economic issues, tough times, tightening the belt, lay offs (declared and not declared), sectoral impact etc etc. In a nutshell "get into the shell for safety". Then I met Rajan S, a dear friend. I knew that he has lost a good more than 50% of his investments in stock market and was expecting a similar response that I witnessed in Mumbai. I was all set to ensure that I remain as balanced as possible. "Hi, welcome to my newly decorated home" he exclaimed. "I went and bought two easy chairs, 5 decorative pieces, 5 pairs of trousers for myself along with 5 shirts, kids wardrobe has been replenished, wifey has bought some sarees and suits and not to talk of new curtains; all in the last fortnight" he went non stop "there are such great

Irresponsible youngsters?

One of the common references made by people of upper youth (40+, a la upper ground floor) for kids (25 years old) is that they are short of hard work and irresponsible. Is it perception or is it a reality? End of the day reality is nothing but a perception seen with coloured glasses. Today's youth is in fact far more responsible than ever before. The key difference, as I see it, is about the attitude to life and living a full life. Unlike earlier times, where opportunities, resources and exposure were low, the time was largely spent in office/college and at home. Look at options today and the affordability quotient. Today's youth want all that without compromising on the content of each of the part played in life. Work hard is turning to work smart. Party hard is turning to party and network smat and so on. Professionals would have had limited ambitions a couple of decades ago. Dream would be to be a GM or at best a VP before retirement. Todays young want to be there by mid thi